In the latest twist surrounding the enigmatic lives of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, rumors have surfaced suggesting that their son, Archie, might be missing from the vaccine database. This claim, initially suggested by a blind item, has fueled intense speculation, especially given the couple’s vocal advocacy for COVID-19 vaccinations.

The situation has left many puzzled, questioning the consistency of the couple’s public stance on vaccinations and their private choices. For a duo that has been at the forefront of promoting vaccine equity and urging the public to get vaccinated, the idea that Archie might not be vaccinated raises eyebrows.

The controversy deepens with whispers that perhaps there’s no record of Archie at all in the vaccine database, leading to wild theories and even wilder accusations. Critics have seized on the irony of the situation, pointing out that Harry and Meghan’s involvement in a high-profile vaccination campaign seems hypocritical if they haven’t followed the same guidelines for their own child. The couple’s public appearances during the pandemic, where they championed the importance of vaccinations, now appear questionable in light of these rumors. As one observer put it, the Sussexes seem to believe in “rules for thee but not for me”—pushing vaccines on others but not following the same guidelines for their own family.

Adding fuel to the fire, skeptics are questioning how Archie could have entered the United States during the COVID lockdowns without being vaccinated, especially when international travelers, including children, were required to show proof of vaccination. This inconsistency has led some to speculate that perhaps Archie isn’t vaccinated at all, a notion that seems contradictory to Harry and Meghan’s public advocacy.

The situation becomes even murkier as Archie is expected to start school soon. The question on everyone’s mind is whether the couple will be able to provide the necessary proof of vaccination, a requirement for school enrollment. With September approaching, all eyes are on the Sussexes to see what unfolds. Some believe that what we don’t see may be more telling than what we do.

The mysterious nature of Harry and Meghan’s children, often referred to as the “invisible kids,” has led to a growing number of conspiracy theories. Some even suggest that the children are being phased out of the public narrative altogether, stored away like old toys in the proverbial attic alongside other relics of the couple’s past. These bizarre theories extend beyond just vaccines; some critics argue that the entire situation resembles a soap opera where the children could be conveniently forgotten or even replaced by actors as they grow older.

But why would Harry and Meghan go to such lengths? One theory posits that Meghan wanted a natural-born princess to fulfill her childhood fantasies, inspired by her favorite comic book character. Another suggests that more children could mean more financial benefits, hinting at potential monetary gains from child support.

Medical records are, of course, private, and the Sussexes are under no obligation to publicly disclose their children’s vaccination status. However, many are curious about how they will navigate the practicalities of school enrollment without these records. As one parent pointed out, “I couldn’t even put my kids on a waitlist for preschool without proof of vaccination.”

Doubts about the existence of Archie and Lilibet have lingered since the couple’s departure from royal duties. Skeptics argue that it’s inconceivable for a family to live so publicly yet have children who are never seen in ordinary situations—no trips to the store, no playdates, no family outings. The absence of any sightings has led some to believe that the entire narrative around the Sussex children might be a carefully constructed facade